A little curation on curation for associations
Two weeks ago I shared a few thoughts on how the concept of curation might work (or is working) in the retail industry, and I promised to dig a little deeper into curation in the association context. That post drew some interesting comments, so first I recommend going back and reading them.
That discussion got me thinking a lot about the topic, and so I spent some time reading what others have written about content curation already (which is quite a lot). In the interest of practicing what I preach (and in not restating what others have already said much better than I could), I decided to gather and share a handful of the most useful resources I've found on content curation:
Where to start if you're new to "curation":
- Beth Kanter: "Content Curation Primer," October 4, 2011
- Rohit Bhargava: "The 5 Models Of Content Curation," March 31, 2011
On the actual job of curation:
- Steve Rosenbaum: "Content Curators Are The New Superheros Of The Web," April 16, 2012
- Robin Good: "Real-Time News Curation - The Complete Guide Part 5: The Curator Attributes And Skills," October 6, 2010
- Robin Good: "Real-Time News Curation - The Complete Guide Part 6: The Tools Universe," October 13, 2010
- Robert Bruce: "How to Dominate Your Industry like Drudge"
On associations' role as content curators:
- Ellen Behrens: "Content Curation," August 19, 2011
- Jeff Hurt: "The Person Who Chooses Your Conference Content Has All The Power," December 12, 2011
- Steve Drake: "In 'Content Fried' World, Associations Content Curation Can Benefit Members," February 14, 2012
- Aaron Wolowiec: "Associations as curators: Supporting your speakers, educators and facilitators to success," January 18, 2012
- Steve Rosenbaum: "Will Associations Become Filters for Digital Overload?" May 6, 2012
- Maggie McGary: "Why I Doubt Associations Will Become Filters for Digital Overload," May 9, 2012
More curated info about curation:
- "Net2 Think Tank Round-up: Curating Content," September 26, 2011
- "Content and Curation for Nonprofits," Scoop.It page curated by Beth Kanter
- "Content Curation for NonProfits," Scoop.It page curated by Ken Dickens
After all that reading, I came to a couple conclusions that I think can also help you approach curation at your association:
Curation is a philosophy, not a tactic. If you take some time to read some or all of these articles, you'll find that "curation" takes on a lot of different meanings and forms, depending on who you talk to. You might find that frustrating, particularly if you're looking for how-do-I-do-it-today advice, but I think curation is best viewed as a philosophy rather than a tactic. I like Rohit Bhargava's definintion, because it encompasses any range of methods that accomplish the same goal: "finding, grouping, organizing, or sharing the best and most relevant content on a specific issue."
You can apply that goal to just about any form of content that your association might produce, ranging from blogs and magazines to research and education. But make note of the wording: "the best and most relevant content," not "your best and most relevant content." That's the shift that associations have to make, from being the source of expertise to being the conveyer of expertise, regardless of the source. Viewed this way, curation is more of a new filter or lens through which to look at the things associations already do, rather than an entirely new source of value.
Real time vs. long tail. Of all the various forms that content curation can take, I see them mostly falling into one of two buckets, which I haven't seen clearly identified elsewhere:
- Real-time curation. This is the ongoing, day-to-day form of curation. It's how you keep your members up to date. The subject area can be wide (as wide as your association's profession, perhaps), and the criteria for selection expand from "best" and "relevant" to also include "new." This form can appeal to a big audience, but it has a short shelf life, as it needs constant attention. Think "today's top news."
- Long-tail curation. This is the long-term, highly specific form of curation. It's how you help your members dig deep into a topic. The subject area in each case is narrow, and the criteria for selection might be best described as "the absolute best" and "the most relevant." And the timeframe for selected content can go back for years, as long as the content stays relevant. This form appeals to a specific audience in each case, but it has a long shelf life. It could be maintained with only periodic updating. Think "Wikipedia."
Both of these forms can be valuable for associations to provide to their audiences, because they address two different user scenarios: the user who engages often to stay in touch, and the user who only comes to you when they have a specific problem to solve. (Of course, these aren't exclusive; a single person can engage with your association in both ways at different times.) But in either case, if your association is the place to easily find the best information and knowledge from throughout your profession, you'll keep those users (members or non) coming back.
| | Permalink |
Comments
One of the interesting things about social curation is that I don't find the major public social networks (Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn) are particularly well-suited for this type of activity. I don't see any easy way with any of them to create a evolving collection of information that is structured in any way. I used to use delicious a number of years ago, and it was better, but in the end I moved away from it because the signal to noise ratio just wasn't high enough for me. So, I'm curious as to what people are using for social curation these days.
Posted by: Terry Coatta | May 14, 2012 5:35 PM
Great post Joe and I also like Bhargava's definition.
Terry raises a good question. Those I follow who are curating seem to use Scoop.it most, some are playing with Pinterest, and a few (like Brain Pickings) does it the old-fashioned way in an email newsletter.
Posted by: Jeffrey Cufaude | May 15, 2012 2:50 PM
Thanks Terry and Jeffrey. I agree: there definitely isn't one particular tool that is perfect for curation, and I think that's mainly because it's such a multi-faceted endeavor (again, more of a philosophy than a tactic).
Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn all present their unique advantages and challenges, as does any tool. In those places, you could do real-time curation if you carved out a clear space for it, such as a hashtag or even an individual @name or Page, dedicated specifically to curated information. Plenty of people do it that way in a very simple fashion.
Scoop.It provides a nice looking collection of those links as you gather and share them, as does Pinterest. From the curator's point of view, these are both handy, but the challenge still lies in getting eyeballs on those items, when your audience likely follows you through email, RSS, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, or other channels. I think that's why you see tools like Scoop.It adding Twitter and RSS integration. In the end, anything you broadcast you want your audience to be able to consume in their preferred method. Which is why Jeffrey's point about Brain Pickings is a good one. There's nothing wrong with an email newsletter if that's what your audience likes.
Long-tail curation, on the other hand, strikes me as something that the curator needs more control over: a web page, an infographic, an entire website, a print brochure, presentation slides, videos. Any and all of the above. The design of how the curated info is presented to the user is a lot more important in that case, IMO.
Posted by: Joe Rominiecki | May 16, 2012 3:36 PM