Someone to tell you you're crazy
We all live in bubbles, little worlds unto ourselves that we create so we can manage our lives with some sense of sanity. But if we stay in those bubbles for too long or if we don't let others in, they become echo chambers, where all we hear is whatever we tell ourselves. This goes for people and for organizations.
This came to mind after I read Jamie Notter's blog post on Monday about competing narratives, as well as Joe Gerstandt's post (that Jamie linked to) about the intersections of those competing narratives.
Since the ASAE Annual Meeting & Expo last month, I've been wanting to revisit a bold statement from closing general session speaker Peter Sheahan. I'm paraphrasing because I didn't take down his exact quote, but here it is:
The association governance model means associations are forced into meeting the needs of legacy members and not the needs that arise in the future. The system is built not to change.
That's a competing narrative for associations if there ever was one. And Sheahan knew this; he prefaced this idea half-jokingly with "You might not want to bring me back after I say this."
What attendees seemed to love about Sheahan's presentation was that he had clearly spent some time studying associations. And after a little studying, he gave his outsider's viewpoints, one of which (the above) equated to "what you're doing here seems a little crazy."
We all need that viewpoint once in a while. We need someone to tell us we're doing something that doesn't make sense. Otherwise, we'll remain blind to it. As Joe G. so eloquently put it, "At the point where two or more competing narratives interface, collide, merge, mesh or dance lives tremendous potential."
Association executives can seek out these intersections for their members, boards, and staff. Bring in a conference speaker from the outside who's willing to study your industry and question its practices. Invite visitors to your board meetings or to spend a day with your staff. As long as they're willing to be honest and ask questions, it doesn't matter who it is. A good consultant should give you an honest perspective. Or it could be John Doe off the street. Or it could be your mother, the one who still doesn't quite understand what you do, even though you've explained it a thousand times.
Sheahan said "someone has to agitate." He did it for us. He gave us a competing narrative. Now go find someone to do it for your association.
| | Permalink |
Comments
Love this suggestion, Joe. I heard Harrison Coerver speak this morning at AENC about Race for Relevance. His message resonates with the Sheahan quote. Kicking myself for forgetting to buy his book.
I heard another good suggestion last week from a Disney executive that would work really well in our industry although the bubble heads will hate it -- ask a question, get an answer and then ask Why, ask Why again and then again -- three times. The first two times you'll get lame robotic answers (the party line or conditioned response), but the third time you'll start getting to the nugget that needs to be unearthed and examined.
Posted by: Deirdre Reid | September 23, 2011 5:44 PM
Thanks Deirdre. I love the Why 3x idea. The purpose of the finding competing narratives is to cast "the story you tell yourself" in a new light and examine it for what it is rather than letting it live on as a reflex. I think the asking why three times reaches the exact same purpose.
Posted by: Joe Rominiecki | September 26, 2011 1:34 PM