« Quick clicks: So hot right now edition | Main | Can small innovation sustain us? »

Value in commiseration

If you read this month's Horizons column by Betsy Boyd-Flynn, CAE, in Associations Now, you know she and her organization have been through some difficult experiences of late. This week Betsy followed up with me to mention that she'd received several emails from fellow association professionals who all said it was nice to read about a colleague facing similar challenges. She described them as "me too" messages.

This reminded me of an important dynamic that I often lose sight of: Sometimes it feels good to commiserate with a colleague, even if there aren't any answers to a problem. It's nice to know you're not alone. Blowing off some steam lowers stress, and it creates a natural bond between colleagues.

We all know that, of course, but my job is generally to find and share people's answers to problems, and I think a lot of association jobs are focused on that. And even when an association promotes a networking event, for instance, it's often played as a chance to learn from colleagues and to meet people who could become future business partners or colleagues. Those are the more tangible benefits, which is why they're easier to point to, but a lot of the value in networking is in shared experience. We talk about programs that offer "takeaways" for participants, but the simple bonding over shared experiences is what leads to the positive feelings people have when they walk away from a face-to-face event.

In a time when so many challenges have no immediate answer—economic woes, evolving technology, and shifting demographics come to mind—associations will do will when they provide their members and customers with opportunities to commiserate, to share stories, to understand each other, and to feel understood.

|

Comments

Didn't mention this in the post, but I'd be remiss to not point to what dangers might lie at the other end of the spectrum, when commiseration turns to gossip. Jeffrey Cufaude shared some wise words of caution last year in his post "The price of sharing that war story with a colleague."

The balance between commiseration and finding solutions to our problems seems to be what draws us to or repels us from attending roundtables. You made me think back to a few ASAE Super Swaps including last week's-always a crowded room and great contributions from specific participants, yet many people don't say a word. They seem to leave the session happy with lots of notes and give nice evaluations, but I've always presumed that they're happy not finding a solution because they only wanted commiseration. Sure, finding out you're not alone can be reassuring, but I'm thinking of one participant sitting in this last session who asked at the end "Tell me specific things I can do in my association" when during the session I heard at least a dozen great ideas. Maybe the problems in our associations don't have any immediate solutions, but especially in times like this I suspect many of us need to stretch ourselves a little and learn to extrapolate better from the experiences that our peers are sharing from a podium or across the table from us: otherwise we're missing many real takeaways, and most of the value of being in an audience.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)