« Small staff associations: How to manage with limited resources | Main | Using free tech tools »

Learning to ride the leadership roller coaster

First up of our consultants who lead discussions among small staff associations is Rhea Blanken from Results Technology, who had these takeaways from her session:

Ever feel like you can't get out of the weeds long enough to lead your association the way you wish you could and know you should? Ever feel buried in minutiae, unable to take reflective time to image the future? Feeling unable to use the simplest time management tools because there is no time? Does this sound like a familiar small association staff chorus?

The problem with this long-standing attitude is that it's technically not really a problem. A problem is defined by its "either/or," "yes/no" quality--a decision is made confirming an action and eliminating others. A small association executive has the doing/imagining as well as the managing/leading roles constantly at play--it is not an either/or situation yet we talk about it that way. We must plan more time for "and."

This "and time" requires seeing one's efforts as a set of interdependent principles and actions, each necessary over time to create positive sustainable results to advance the organization. Too much attention on one side or the other will leave the organization lopsided. Too much concentrated activity and resources in the present will leave no room for future planning and vice versa. This is the paradox or contradiction of leadership--respecting the necessary tension between taking the time for now and making the time to think for later. Stop expecting it to be either/or. As often as not, "and" is what it looks like when it's working.

What's necessary is to create a neutral space where comparison, inquiry, discussion, and examination allow the staff and the organization to put into play the positive aspects of the supposed contradiction. This balances both sides rather than trying to force a solution into one. When we try to solve something that is not designed to be solution-based, we get resistance to the solution. A quick review of failed initiatives from board and staff is likely to reveal the reality of this circumstance. When we manage these paradoxes for their benefits and perspectives, we see attainable results. As Abraham Maslow said, "If the only tool you have is a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail." Reach into the whole tool box.

A Few Perspectives Along the Roller Coaster

  • Leaders who see the "and" rather than the either/or of life are more effective at mediation, better able to anticipate and diminish problems from occurring, and tend to be better decision makers since they are not limited to either/or scenarios.

  • Make time in your schedule to think in the now and the future. Distinguish between problems that are inherently solvable and finite, and those that are both unsolvable and unavoidable. Investigate both the positive and negative aspects and effects of each side. Then combine the points of view in each to get a more complete picture of the known situation.

  • Be mindful of the organizational preferences to one side over another--if it favors one view over another then the decision is likely vulnerable to being overly focused and out of balance. Be clear on the positive and negative preferences the organization holds for one side over another and the reasons (check out sacred cows and historical baggage).

The bottom line
"Nothing will ever be attempted if all possible objections must be first overcome."
- Samuel Johnson

|

Comments

Rhea, thanks for the gentle reminder of the importance of balance. You outline some really good tools to manage and balance our multiple projects. I also think that this is a great list to share with our entire staff. We all need to take the time to think, listen and ask -- what if?

Rhea -

Terrific reminder about "and." So often the decision tree is presented like a flow chart - since this, then that leaving no room for "what if...."

Many of the decision making processes we employ have us laying out options on the table and then systematically eliminating the weakest/most expensive/most time consuming options until we reach "the winner." Time is often the enemy rushing that process to a premature conclusion simply so we can move on to the next task.

A more expansive process may be necessary to truly see the possibilities - perhaps combining options or rearranging them.

Thank you for your post....

Shelly

Thanks, Rhea.

Association leadership requires thinking before acting, intention before attention.


The fewer the resources, the more critical it is to "multi-purpose," not "multi-task."

Cheers
Ann Oliveri

Great advice - but I would also add that working for a large trade has the the very same pitfalls - especially in this economy with all of the belt tightening and doubling up on responsibilities. We have to remind/train ourselves each day to stop automatically hammering and take a step back.

Thanks for reminding me to stop and think - keeping results rather than tasks at the forefront.

Libby

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)