The wrong way to renew
If you read Cynthia D’Amour’s blog you will have seen multiple posts on a series of renewals that she has been receiving from a group she used to belong to. She was nice enough to share her reaction to their efforts, and in a sad way it has been pretty funny. I recently had a similar experience.
I had been a member of a local association on and off for over 15 years and recently decided not to renew. From what I recall their renewal marketing started 3-4 months before my membership lapsed, with a letter telling me to renew my membership. Pretty simple and straightforward, but it obviously did not get me to reconsider my decision. Over the next few months, I got an email or two along with a few more letters. The one that got me to write this is what I will call the “expire” letter.
The letter was all about them and nothing about me. It inferred that if I didn’t renew I would no longer be a member of the cool kids club. It told me about all the great things happening at the organization—events, my subscription to their publication, my complimentary listing in their directory and lots of discounts. Nowhere in the letter did it tell me anything about how membership would solve any of my needs or address any of my challenges yet it told me how I would value my membership all year long. To put icing on the cake there was a sentence in there that I didn’t even understand: “You won’t want to miss from free subscription to any more issues of our publication.” Huh?
The mailing also included a renewal form. The renewal form did have my name lasered in at the top with my member number and my expiration date, which was good. Unfortunately it also included a rehash of all the products and services they told me I would miss from the letter. Again, nothing telling me how I would benefit from my membership. The topper: At the end of the form it told me to keep my benefits flowing. What benefits? They didn’t tell me what they are.
I have 3 points here:
1. Do associations, or any organizations for that matter, no longer understand the difference between features and benefits? Benefits sell. Features don’t. Do members care that you sell a book? Or do members care that the book will help them go further in their career, or do their job better, stay up to date on all of the latest information or even make more money?
2. Are we doing the little things that we need to do to appear professional? Someone should have proofread the letter that I received. If I was on the fence with my membership, as I was, a bad impression can be the last impression.
3. Are we taking advantage of technology? The letter and renewal form I received was not customized to my needs; it was totally generic. They know my purchasing history so they should be able to tailor a piece of their renewal effort to me as an individual. I am not asking for true one to one marketing but something closer would be nice.
I am not writing this to beat up this one organization. I am writing this because I think that with everything else association staff members have to do on a daily basis, renewals sometimes get dumped into the “have to do,” not the “want to do,” category and are not given the attention they deserve. Retaining members is critical for the majority of associations. If we are not doing everything we can with our renewal series to get members to retain their membership, then we are not doing our jobs.
| | Permalink |
Comments
Scott - Great post. Left me curious, though. Why did you decide not to renew? What could they have said to get YOU to reconsider, considering that you're a pretty savvy member.
Posted by: Lindy Dreyer | May 5, 2009 4:50 PM
And at what point do we shift from paper to people and pick up the phone and talk with non-renewals?
We association with other people, not with stacks and stacks of paper, but I rarely have had human contact from an association when I chose not to renew my membership. Why not involve volunteers both as ambassadors for new members when they join and as association advocates for non-renewals?
Posted by: Jeffrey Cufaude | May 5, 2009 7:27 PM
Hi Lindy,
I don't know what they could have done with the actual renewal series to get me to renew because most of the damage had already been done by the time they asked me to renew. The renewal series just typified the way they did everything else, impersonal and un-professional.
Although the group is local they did very little to form a relationship with me. One staff member did ask me my opinion once but after hearing it and actually agreeing with my perspective in many ways, did nothing to change it and did not follow up with me again.
I was also a very active volunteer and did not get any recognition for my efforts. Of course there was supposed to be a volunteer recognition luncheon or something but why would I attend if I didn't feel my efforts were appreciated while they were happening or right after? I really hope that associations don't wait until formal affairs to recognize their volunteers. If their members are like me that just gives them more time to feel unappreciated which is not a good thing come renewal time.
Were their renewal efforts strong? Absolutely not. Would I have possibly ignored the weak renewal strategy if I felt a part of the organization and got value from it during the membership year. Absolutely!
Posted by: Scott Oser | May 5, 2009 8:25 PM
Scott, Look on the bright side--these practices are so prevalent that you'll always have a nice consulting practice. :O)
The interesting thing about this post is that many association execs could read and nod, ignoring the fact that their renewal series has the same effect on many people. Of course I would contend (as you're alluding to in your response to Lindy) that if the organisation has to persuade you to renew through the renewal mailings, it's probably too late and you already made up your mind.
I always compare our renewal mechanisms to publication renewals and how periodicals trained many of us to throw away the first three and to look closely for the field that (maybe) shows when our registration expires. Associations often err on the side of excess caution in determining the frequency of their renewals and in how quickly they give up on those who don't respond, but pubs (and charities too) often treat their reader or donor like a dog with a bone. I used to hear 'experts' speaking to groups recommending that they conduct followups until they're no longer breakeven.
No matter how impersonal and features-focused their renewal series, I gather they didn't repeat the mistake 7 or 8 times, at least!
Posted by: Kevin Whorton | May 6, 2009 2:24 AM