« Antitrust back in the spotlight | Main | Managing across generations »

Building and sustaining community

Last week, we took a look at some of Clay Shirky's thoughts on community. This week, we're continuing our exploration of the "community" theme with a conversation with Maddie Grant and Lindy Dreyer of SocialFish.

Maddie and Lindy have demonstrated their community-building talents in a number of ways--through YAP, their contributions to the Association Social Media Wiki, and through their own blogs and their active and enthusiastic participation in the association blogging community. They're also currently writing a book on building community, so I wanted to take this opportunity to pick their brains about that very topic.

How do you define “community”?

Lindy: When people bond together over a shared interest, they form community. Community is a complex matrix of adjacent and overlapping relationships. Community has gravity. The more massive the group, the bigger the pull. The closer the relationships, the tighter the bond.

Can a community be built from the ground up, or does community develop organically?

Maddie: Yes and yes! You need both forces at work. The key driver to building community is passion. When you hear about a community that develops organically, you're actually hearing about a community that was built from the ground up by a group of passionate people. In our work with clients who are building community online, every successful community has at its core a small group of tireless champions--usually a mix of members, staff, and even stakeholders from outside the organization.

In building or growing a new community, what are the roles of the community builders, versus community members?

Maddie: New communities need people in three important roles--builders/managers, members, and champions.

The first role you mentioned--the community builders or community managers--are the people who are defining the space, setting the tone, and hosting the party, so to speak. In the association context, this is likely a staff role. A great community builder knows when to get involved to settle a dispute or stoke a conversation, and when to get out of the way and let others in the community take center stage.

The second role you mentioned--the community members--really define their own role. Their engagement levels will ebb and flow, where they will dip in and out of the space as they choose. Some will become champions, others will only participate temporarily, and that's OK. This is their space to do with as they please, so long as they adhere to the community's core values and culture.

The third role--community champions--are the community members who are so passionate they take the lead. The community champions have an important bridging role between the community builders and the community members.

What do you think are the secrets to building a sustainable community—one that will last for the long haul? (On a related note, do you feel sustainability is always an important goal for community builders to have?)

Maddie: Many communities form to tackle a specific task or issue. Once solved, the community happily dissolves. So no, sustainability is not always an important goal. That said, for an association to be sustainable, its community must be sustainable

Lindy: One secret: All community forms in small groups. This is something that Peter Block covers well in his book Community: The Structure of Belonging. Large communities have a large number of small, tightly bonded groups. And within those groups, there are connectors who bond the small groups to other small groups. I think it's easy, as association executives, to gloss over the needs of the small groups in favor of the big picture, and the big picture is very important, so I get it. But when it comes to building community, the small group IS the big picture.

Is there anything I haven’t asked you that you think is important to think about when you’re thinking about building community?

Maddie: Many associations are actually quite accomplished at building community, at least in real life. But we're way behind in establishing ourselves as community builders online. (Which is actually related to another secret to success--reinforce online connections through offline events and vice versa.) There's a difference between having an "online community," versus having a community online. You can buy the tool, but not the relationships.

|

Comments

Thanks Maddie, Lindy and Lisa. As someone who spends a lot of time working with organizations on building and sustaining community, I appreciate your sharing your insights on this important topic. I especially agree with one of Maddie's last comments about the need to "reinforce online connections through offline events and vice versa". I sometimes worry that we are creating a new division between people who focus on online (virtual) community vis a vis those who focus on face-to-face community, when like much of the rest of what we are and do, they can (and should) be successfully integrated.

Good point, Bonnie. And something we should keep in mind when we are setting up project teams inside our organization. There should always be someone asking "how can we build community around this...and how can we connect it to the community we've already built."

Thank you for this post. This is something the Texas Association of Museums is working towards, and your thoughts will be helpful in our discussions as we move forward. Thanks again!

Bravo for separating sustainability from outcomes and goals. One of the greatest disservices we do to groups is requiring or assuming they need to "go on" (can you say standing committee?). As soon as we accept the premise that the "group" isn't important but the "community" is we allow ebbs and flows within our organizations.

I mostly agree with the statement "Many associations are actually quite accomplished at building community" although I have to say that I think its serendipity and that in fact some of our processes put up barriers (think formal group structures, governance models, need to have control). For that reason I guess I really zeroed in on Lindy's comment "But when it comes to building community, the small group IS the big picture" which if we accept becomes a great way of countering the barriers.

Thanks for bringing the conversation to the table!

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)