« Finding Retention in Unexpected Places | Main | Can We Talk? »

Now how did THAT happen?

I am a CEO and Education Director of a small staff association. For most of my professional life I have been a licensed health care provider and educator; in some ways I am an “accidental” chief staff officer. A couple of years ago the executive committee of the association approached me to help troubleshoot some issues. The organization had recently lost a key staff person and was struggling to stay upright during a very rocky transition. A business manager had been brought in but resigned after only a few months, leaving the association in a worse position. Having served as the board president of the organization four years earlier, the exec committee thought I could provide some insight about the association and help assess its situation. A few weeks as a consultant turned into a year as chief operating officer, and transitioned to the chief staff officer a few months ago.

It’s been amazingly busy and I felt overwhelmed at times, learning the skill set of organizational management. Resources such as ASAE, especially the Diversity in Executive Leadership Program (DELP), and other association professionals have been very helpful (lesson number 1: no one goes at this alone!). I’ve been able to come to place where, while everyday is still daunting in challenges, it becomes a bit easier to see the brass ring - all of the intricacies of fulfilling the organization’s mission from a broader perspective. It’s easy to become lost in the minutiae of day-to-day operations - and sometimes that’s really important to do. Yet staying down in the weeds can be disorienting; the CEO can’t afford to lose the crucial sense of direction.

Membership is a key example. Our association has had a steady number of members for the past 5 years. No contraction yet no growth. The staff and board have had meetings to talk about why this is the case. Many reasons have been cited - not enough advertising; not enough benefits; few outreach efforts, to mention just a couple. In thinking this over, larger questions came to mind: Just who is our membership? Why do they join? Is there a need that we not meeting? Is there a segment that we are not thinking about? As simple as these questions are, we have actually few answers - no surveys, no data crunching. The mechanics of attracting new members becomes easier if the organization is clear about whom it really serves. We’re working on finding the answers to these questions right now, going through our database and asking existing members about why they joined. We hope to also ask those folks who are NOT members why that’s the case.

We’re using low-cost tools to do this, and it’s slower-going than I would like, but I also know this information will help us in the long run, and make us stronger in the process.

|

Comments

Art it sounds like you are definitely asking the right questions. No matter how slow the process is now it will be worth it once you have collected all the data. The more information you know about your members the better you can anticipate their needs and ensure the long term viability of the association.

We're working now on a needs analysis and indispensability study for one of our medical association client. If we can offer any help or advice during your research phase let me know.

Hi Art,

It's good to hear that you recognized the information gap that exists. As I was reading your post I wondered how many associations get to your first step: "the staff and board have had meetings to talk about why this is the case" and get no further. This is an important intermediate step but it's also a very expensive one because of the staff/overhead that's allocated to the discussion process, which almost always occurs over a long period of time with no logical conclusion.

To me it's always faster, easier and cheaper to do that second step--to simply collect & analyze the data--becuase it's fundamentally a mechanical process. Once you have gone through the learning curve to test & deploy your first online study, next steps should be rather easy.

Internal discussions may have been valuable in surfacing some hypotheses and convincing leadership that you need to go the extra step, but data collection should take no more than 4-5 weeks to plan, launch & execute and much of the work you incur in design & planning for membership studies will overlap with non-members as well.

I know you have more of a philosophical point to make here, but balancing consensus & discussion with action should be a smooth transition and help you feed further discussions with far better decision support!

Kevin

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)