« Association/Nonprofit Employers of Choice for the Over-50 Crowd | Main | The fine line between reinventing and stalling »

Ahhh, the human factor ...

Even when taking into account the power of money and the marvels of technology; when all is said and done it always comes back to people, doesn’t it?

When Warren Buffet, the world’s richest human being, was interviewed recently by Parade magazine and asked what constituted happiness, he replied that for him happiness was not found in the accumulation of vast sums of money or power but rather to have “lived life knowing that you are loved by those who matter to you.” From any other person such an observation might sound banal, but Buffet’s comment rang true.

Clearly, as we witness the meltdown of the capital markets of the world’s wealthiest nation we cannot help but be reminded of the limits of material wealth. And as overwhelming as our nation’s military power is, Bob Woodward’s most recent book reveals that the key to our success in Iraq is found in the network of human connections our intelligence services have woven within Iraqi society—not in any wiz-bang technology or our overwhelming armed forces per se.

So it appeared in the case study research we did for The Power of Partnership, the keys to success in association-driven partnerships were found in the “soft” factors—the human relationships that were strategically woven together—as opposed to the size and muscle power of any one entity.

Lee Iacocca, the famous automotive executive who engineered the turn around of Chrysler in the 1980s, observed in one of his earlier memoires that he was always leery of managers whose performance reports cited their brilliance but noted that they had problems with people. ‘What else is there,” Iacocca asked “that a manager should be concerned with except people?”

But the question remains, are the personal qualities that make certain people so skillful in managing human relationships innate, or are they acquired? Can these skills be learned?

|

Comments

Oh dear, another nature vs. nurture conundrum! I'm hesitant to weigh in on that but I can say with certainty that I am much better at the human factor now than I was in my early working years. Call it growing up, life experience, perspective, maturity, operant conditioning or all the above, but somewhere along the way I figured out it wasn't all about me, it was all about them, whoever "they" are in any given situation, and that made all the difference.

So I wonder if that recognition is imbedded in everyone (nature) and, depending on how life and work play out (nurture), it comes forth earlier or later, in different degrees, and in some cases not at all, at least not in this lifetime!

Nice. I think Joyce is correct. Human beings are social animals. That includes all of us--even the most grumpy misanthropes! So even though some of us may believe ourselves to be tone-deaf in our human relationships, all have the innate ability to learn to be skillful in our dealings with others.

I use the word "skillful" as opposed to loving, sensitive or caring, because "The Power of Partnership" discusses the wonderful practicality of certain kinds of human relationships when applied in a business context. Some may be better at this than others, but all of us in our human-ness have the instinctive rhythms of human relations encoded in our genes.

Like Moliere's "bourgeois gentleman" who didn't realize he was speaking in prose!--we all have the power to create and wield partnerships that can help us achieve goals that would not have been possible otherwise.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)