« Extreme jobs? | Main | Reuters Partners With Yahoo For Citizen Media Site »

Can associations be mavericks, too?

I had the opportunity last week to hear Polly LaBarre speak about her new book Mavericks at Work. After spending considerable time studying “maverick” companies in industries ranging from entertainment (HBO, Pixar) to retail and mining (Whole Foods, Goldcorp), she and co-author William Taylor have quite a few lessons to share.

One remarkable trait shared by the companies they studied is the concept of “strategy as advocacy.” These companies have a mission and they’re in business to advance it. And by mission, they don’t mean one of those meaningless statements of interchangeable corporate-speak terms. Internet banking company ING Direct wants to “lead Americans back to savings.” Southwest Airlines wants to “democratize the skies.” Cranium, the game company, wants to help people “laugh and feel and connect.”

Of course, using strategy as advocacy means that you will alienate some people. When ING Direct fires approximately 3,500 customers a year—and even rejects potential new customers—that don’t fit in with its mission and criteria, it is doing something alien to most associations (and for-profit businesses, for that matter). As association professionals, we aim to bring people together, and the bigger the tent, the better. But if your association really threw its energy and resources behind a simple, compelling mission—if you had the ability and indeed the requirement to say no to requests that didn’t fit with that mission—how much do you think you could you accomplish?

With that kind of mission, I bet a lot of associations could move forward far more quickly than we can when we try to be all things to all members.

|

Comments

Great post. Saying 'No' to the customer every once in a while is definitely a healthy thing.

“Healthy” is a good word for it. An organization that never says no isn’t so different from a person with unhealthy habits …

Since writing the original post, I’ve continued to think about the whole concept of saying no, creating a stop-doing list, whatever you want to call it. And I’m curious about how the ideal of great customer service intersects with the need to sometimes say no. In my mind, great customer service is generally speaking associated with “yes”—people who go the extra mile to help out a member or customer.

So, how do you reconcile the two, I wonder? Can you leave a member feeling like his or her association offers great customer service even when the answer to a request is sometimes (appropriately) no?

Post a comment

Please enter the security code you see here